Persecution Watch

Tag: minority

The Scapegoat Cycle – Why minority groups are blamed during economic crises.
The Scapegoat Cycle – Why Minority Groups Are Blamed During Economic Crises

Throughout history, minority groups have been unfairly targeted and blamed for societal ills, particularly during times of economic uncertainty. This phenomenon is often referred to as the “scapegoat cycle.” In this article, we’ll explore why minority groups are disproportionately impacted and blamed during economic crises.

The Historical Context
- Immigration and Economic Hardship: In the United States, for example, immigrants have long been scapegoated during times of economic hardship. During the Great Depression, immigrants were seen as a threat to American jobs, leading to increased xenophobia and anti-immigrant sentiment.
- African Americans and Job Competition: Following World War II, African Americans faced discrimination in the job market, with many blaming them for taking jobs away from white workers. This narrative was perpetuated by politicians and media outlets, further entrenching racial tensions.
The Modern-Day Scapegoat Cycle

Today, minority groups continue to bear the brunt of societal frustration during economic crises. The COVID-19 pandemic has seen a rise in anti-asian sentiment, with some individuals blaming Asian Americans for spreading the virus or taking jobs away from others.

“It’s heartbreaking to see people being blamed and targeted based on their race or ethnicity,” said Dr. Angela Dew, a sociologist at the University of California, Berkeley. “These stereotypes are deeply ingrained and perpetuate systemic inequality.”

The Psychological Impact

Minority groups are disproportionately affected by the scapegoat cycle, leading to increased anxiety, stress, and feelings of marginalization.
- Self-Esteem and Confidence: When minority individuals are unfairly blamed for economic woes, it can lead to a loss of self-esteem and confidence. This can have long-term effects on mental health and well-being.
- Social Isolation: The scapegoat cycle can also lead to social isolation, as minority individuals may feel compelled to distance themselves from others to avoid being targeted or judged.
The Importance of Intersectionality

In order to break the cycle of scapegoating, it’s essential to recognize the intersectional nature of economic crises. This means acknowledging the complex ways in which race, gender, class, and other factors intersect to create systemic inequality.

“We need to move beyond a one-size-fits-all approach and instead focus on the specific needs and challenges faced by marginalized communities,” said Dr. Rinku Sen, founder of the Applied Research Center (ARC). “Only then can we begin to build a more just and equitable society.”

The Way Forward

To combat the scapegoat cycle, it’s crucial that policymakers, media outlets, and individuals take a proactive approach to promoting inclusivity and addressing systemic inequality. This includes:
- Educating Ourselves: It’s essential to learn about the historical context of scapegoating and its ongoing impact on minority communities.
- Raising Awareness: By sharing stories and statistics, we can raise awareness about the disproportionate impact of economic crises on minority groups.
January 9, 2026
The Cult Label – How “Othering” language is used to justify violence.
The Cult Label – How “Othering” Language is Used to Justify Violence

The term “cult” has become synonymous with danger and fanaticism, evoking images of brainwashed followers and apocalyptic prophecies. But is the label fair, or does it perpetuate a harmful narrative that justifies violence against minority groups? In recent years, high-profile cases like the FLDS and NXIVM have brought the concept of cults into the public eye, sparking heated debates about free will, manipulation, and the boundaries between religion and criminal activity.

The Power of Language

Sociologist and author Jeffrey Hadden argues that the term “cult” is often used as a pejorative to describe minority religions or groups that don’t conform to societal norms. “The label ‘cult’ is used to discredit, dehumanize, and delegitimize,” he says in an interview with The Conversation. “It’s a way to say, ‘These people are not like us, they’re weird, and they’re dangerous.’”

A History of Prejudice

The term “cult” has its roots in the 17th-century European witch hunts, where anyone deemed outside the mainstream was labeled a “witch.” This “othering” language served as a justification for violence and persecution. Today, the same pattern is seen in modern society. A study by the University of California, Berkeley found that anti-cult rhetoric often relies on stereotypes and misinformation to discredit minority groups.

The Cult Label’s Consequences

The use of the term “cult” can have devastating consequences for individuals and communities. In a New York Times piece, journalist Rachel Aviv describes how the label has been used to justify violence against minority religions like Jehovah’s Witnesses and Muslims. “When people are labeled ‘cults,’ it allows them to be treated as an enemy, rather than a group of human beings with beliefs and practices,” she writes.

A Call for Nuance

Scholars argue that the term “cult” is too broad and lacks nuance, failing to distinguish between legitimate religious groups and those that may warrant concern. A report by the International Cultic Studies Association emphasizes the importance of understanding the complexities of minority religions and avoiding sensationalized language.

Beyond the Label

So what’s the solution? Experts suggest focusing on the individual actions and behaviors, rather than making sweeping judgments about entire groups. “We should be concerned with people’s behavior, not their beliefs or affiliations,” says Hadden. “Let’s focus on creating a society that values free speech, assembly, and association – without resorting to demonizing labels.”

Related Reading
“The cult label is a tool of oppression, used to silence and marginalize minority groups. It’s time for a more nuanced understanding of religious freedom and the importance of respecting all belief systems.” – Jeffrey Hadden
January 8, 2026
The Paper Wall – How bureaucracy is used to stifle minority faiths.
The Paper Wall – How Bureaucracy is Used to Stifle Minority Faiths

The Paper Wall – How bureaucracy is used to stifle minority faiths

Minority religious groups around the world face unique challenges in exercising their right to freedom of religion or belief. One significant obstacle is bureaucratic hurdles that can effectively silence their voices and restrict their practices.
- Permititis: In some countries, minority faiths are forced to navigate a complex web of permits and licenses just to hold religious services or construct places of worship. For instance, the African Institute for Advanced Christian Studies (AIACS) reported that in Nigeria, the Muslim-majority government requires Christian churches to obtain special permits, which can be denied arbitrarily.
- Red tape: Minority faiths often encounter unnecessary administrative barriers when trying to register their religious organizations or obtain legal recognition. The International Association of Religion Journalists (IARJ) noted that in India, the government requires non-Hindu religious groups to undergo a lengthy and cumbersome registration process.
- Lack of representation: Minority faiths may not have adequate representation on government-appointed bodies or interfaith councils, limiting their ability to advocate for their rights and interests. The National Council for Therapeutic Communication (NCTC) reported that in the United States, Muslim and Sikh communities face significant underrepresentation on state-level religious freedom commissions.
“The bureaucratic hurdles we face are not just obstacles but actual barriers to our very existence.” – Dr. Ngozi Okoro, Director of AIACS

These challenges can have serious consequences for minority faiths. They may be forced to operate in secret or go underground, leading to increased risk of persecution and violence. The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief has repeatedly emphasized the need for governments to respect and protect the rights of minority faiths.

By recognizing and addressing these bureaucratic barriers, we can help create a more inclusive environment where all religions and beliefs are valued and respected. As Dr. Okoro noted, “We must not be silenced by red tape. We must use our voices to demand justice and equality.”
January 2, 2026