Persecution Watch

Tag: collection

  • The Census Trap – How “Other” checkboxes are used for state surveillance.

    The Census Trap – How “Other” checkboxes are used for state surveillance.

    The Census Trap – How “Other” Checkboxes are Used for State Surveillance

    The 2020 United States Census was hailed as a major milestone in the country’s history, providing crucial data on demographics and population growth. However, what went unnoticed by many was the inclusion of a seemingly innocuous “other” checkbox option for respondents to report their race or ethnicity.

    But experts warn that this simple-looking box is actually part of a larger effort by government agencies to monitor and control marginalized communities.

    “We’ve been warning about the dangers of census data collection for years,” said civil rights attorney, Miguel Garcia. “The ‘other’ checkbox is just one example of how the government is trying to capture people who don’t fit neatly into their categories. It’s a trap.”

    According to a recent investigation by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), census data has been used to identify and track minority communities, often with devastating consequences.

    “The census data is being shared with law enforcement agencies, immigration officials, and other government entities,” said Katharine Sawyer, an ACLU spokesperson. “It’s a clear violation of people’s privacy and civil liberties.”

    The ACLU has launched a lawsuit against the U.S. Census Bureau, alleging that the collection and sharing of census data is unconstitutional.

    “This is not just about collecting numbers; it’s about creating a database for government surveillance,” said David Cole, legal director at the ACLU. “We’re talking about a system that can be used to track people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or political beliefs.”

    The inclusion of the “other” checkbox is just one example of how the census data collection process has been manipulated by government agencies.

    “The ‘other’ category was deliberately designed to capture people who don’t fit into the dominant narratives,” said Dr. Maria Rodriguez, a sociology professor at New York University. “It’s a way for the government to identify and monitor marginalized communities, often with harmful consequences.”

    As concerns grow about the misuse of census data, experts are calling for greater transparency and accountability.

    “We need to be vigilant in monitoring how our personal information is being used,” said Miguel Garcia. “The ‘other’ checkbox is just one example of how government agencies can use seemingly harmless data collection practices to surveil and control marginalized communities.”

    For more information on the census data collection process and its implications, visit the American Civil Liberties Union’s website at aclu.org.

  • From Census to Crackdown – How states map belief to suppress it

    From Census to Crackdown – How states map belief to suppress it

    From Census to Crackdown: How States Map Belief to Suppress It

    In an era where data drives policymaking, the intersection of religious beliefs and state power has never been more pronounced. The subtle transformation from collecting demographic data to wielding it as a tool of control is a phenomenon observed across many regimes. This article delves into how states employ data on religious beliefs—often gathered during censuses—to monitor and suppress dissent.

    The Evolution of Data Collection

    Conducting a census has long been a means for governments to understand the demographic composition of their populations. Historically, this practice was limited to counting citizens. However, in the modern age, data collection has evolved into a complex operation that provides detailed insights into the population’s cultural and religious identity.

    • Identification: Citizens are often categorized by religion in national censuses, leading to robust repositories of religious data.
    • Scope of Data: Beyond mere enumeration, the reach now includes qualitative insights into religious practices and affiliations.
    • Intended Use: Ideally, this data aids in policy formulation, ensuring resources are allocated efficiently and equitably.

    “Governments use demographic data not just to serve segments of the population but sometimes to control them.”

    —Pew Research Center

    Mapping Beliefs to Monitoring

    The collection of religious data inevitably leads to the mapping of belief systems. When states start focusing intensely on religious demographics, it begs the question: to what end? The transition from benign categorization to active monitoring is where the potential for suppression grows.

    • Surveillance: With data in hand, states can monitor the movements and activities of specific religious groups.
    • Control: The potential to foster division and target marginalized groups becomes significant where states exploit these divisions.
    • Suppression: Restrictive laws may follow, aimed explicitly at curtailing the freedoms of certain religious communities.

    Case Studies: How States Suppress Through Data

    Several countries have illustrated the dangers of using religious data for suppressive measures:

    • China: The use of technology in regions like Xinjiang exemplifies how data is used to monitor and control religious groups, notably the Uyghurs, through extensive surveillance and data collection. [Read more]
    • India: There have been allegations of utilizing national censuses to implement policies that disproportionately affect minority communities, especially with the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) that many argue targets Muslim populations. [Read more]

    “It is data’s dark side: using what’s intended for the public good against precise targets who may dissent from the majority’s standpoint.”

    —The New York Times

    Strategies of Resistance

    Resistance against the misuse of religious data requires a multifaceted approach:

    • Transparency: Advocacy for clear legislation governing the collection and use of religious data is crucial.
    • Data Privacy: Strengthening data privacy laws can help protect against unauthorized access and misuse.
    • Public Awareness: Educating citizens on their rights regarding data privacy is a powerful step in combating unwarranted state surveillance.

    The Way Forward

    As data becomes increasingly integrated into governance, ensuring that its use aligns with human rights standards is essential. The line between understanding and exploitation should remain distinct and guarded by robust legal frameworks.

    To protect freedom of belief, international bodies and human rights organizations are encouraged to hold states accountable, advocating for ethical data collection and protection of individual freedoms.

    “Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion.”

    —The Universal Declaration of Human Rights

    Ultimately, while capturing demographic data serves a necessary governance function, its potential misuse should be perpetually scrutinized to safeguard individual freedoms and maintain a pluralistic society.