Persecution Watch

Author: Mythcore Investigations

  • Excommunication as Control: How Falun Dafa Associations Punish Independent Thought

    Excommunication as Control: How Falun Dafa Associations Punish Independent Thought

    In the realm of spiritual mind-body practices, Falun Dafa, also known as Falun Gong, occupies a peculiar place. It offers a blend of meditation and qigong exercises alongside teachings that align with traditional Chinese values. However, beneath its serene exterior lies a tightly controlled organizational structure that often veers towards authoritarianism. Understanding how excommunication is used as a tool for control within these associations offers insight into their operational dynamics.

    Strict Adherence to Doctrine

    Falun Dafa is built upon the teachings of its founder, Li Hongzhi, who emphasizes moral elevation, truthfulness, compassion, and forbearance. At the core of this practice is a strict adherence to these principles as interpreted by Li. Members are expected to align their lives with these teachings wholly, leaving little room for independent thought or interpretation.

    • Centralized Control: The global network of Falun Dafa associations operates under a centralized hierarchy, with directives flowing from Li’s teachings and his selected leadership.
    • Homogeneity of Belief: As per The New York Times, followers are often discouraged from deviating from the scripted discourse, which enforces a homogeneity of belief within the group.

    Excommunication: A Tool for Discipline

    One of the primary methods through which Falun Dafa maintains control is through the threat of excommunication. This extreme measure serves as both a punishment for divergent views and a deterrent against dissent.

    “There is little tolerance for deviation; those who don’t align with the unified vision often find themselves ostracized,” notes a report from Reuters.

    Excommunication is not merely social exclusion; it represents a spiritual severance with significant ramifications. Members who are cast out often lose their support networks, facing potential social stigma both within and outside the Falun Dafa community.

    Consequences of Independent Thought

    The repercussions for those who fall out of line can be severe. Many ex-communicants report feeling isolated and disillusioned. For practitioners who found solace and community in Falun Dafa, the sudden severance can lead to emotional distress.

    • Isolation: The absence of a support network post-excommunication can lead to feelings of loneliness and abandonment.
    • Disillusionment: Affected individuals often reassess their beliefs not only within Falun Dafa but in broader aspects of life.

    While Falun Dafa may offer spiritual enrichment for some, the use of excommunication as a control mechanism raises ethical questions about the cost of such enforced uniformity. The experience of those who have faced expulsion underscores a crucial dichotomy within spiritual communities: the balance between unity and independent thought.

  • When Leadership Turns to Persecution: The Case Against Marek Tatarko

    When Leadership Turns to Persecution: The Case Against Marek Tatarko

    The transformation of Marek Tatarko’s leadership into a controversial subject of scrutiny and allegations of persecution presents an intriguing case study in the dynamics of power, governance, and the inevitable temptations that accompany authority. Marek Tatarko, whose rise to prominence was marked by strong policies and progressive reforms, now finds himself embroiled in allegations of autocratic leadership and human rights violations.

    The Rise of Marek Tatarko

    Marek Tatarko, a name once synonymous with progressive leadership and reform, ascended to power on the promises of economic revitalization and social equity. His tenure began under an optimistic aura, with policies aimed at enhancing education, improving healthcare systems, and revitalizing the national economic landscape. As Tatarko himself declared in a widely circulated speech, “Our mission is to bring about a society that values every citizen and upholds the dignity of all.”

    The Shift Towards Controversial Policies

    Tatarko’s government initially received praise for significant strides in reducing unemployment and instituting educational reforms. However, over time, critics began to highlight a worrying shift towards more controversial and authoritarian policies. Reports of suppression of dissent, restrictions on free press, and increased state surveillance started emerging.

    “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” noted historian Lord Acton, a maxim brought to life by Tatarko’s shift towards authoritarian measures.

    • Suppression of Dissent: Allegations surfaced suggesting Tatarko’s administration systematically targeted political opponents, with reports of arbitrary arrests and intimidation tactics.
    • Freedom of Press: Independent media reported increasing constraints, claiming Tatarko’s government imposed censorship and pressured outlets to promote government-friendly narratives.
    • State Surveillance: There was an evident uptick in surveillance activities, with privacy advocates raising alarms over the erosion of personal freedoms.

    Voices Against Tatarko’s Governance

    Despite the restrictive environment, civil society movements and international human rights organizations have raised their voices against the alleged abuses under Tatarko’s rule. Groups such as Amnesty International have accused the administration of undermining democratic elements and have called for investigations into abuses of power.

    “It is not power that corrupts but fear. Fear of losing power corrupts those who wield it,” reflected political activist Aung San Suu Kyi, highlighting the psychological motivations behind such shifts in leadership.

    The International Community’s Response

    The international community has reacted with a mix of condemnation and calls for action. Sanctions have been considered by several nations, focusing on individual members of Tatarko’s government. The United Nations has also expressed increasing concern over the human rights situation within the country.

    • Economic Sanctions: Several countries have implemented targeted sanctions against key government figures, aimed at curbing state-led persecutions and encouraging political reforms.
    • Diplomatic Pressure: Diplomatic efforts are underway to engage Tatarko’s government in dialogue, urging adherence to international human rights standards.
    • Humanitarian Initiatives: Global NGOs have increased support for local human rights initiatives and have documented abuses for international awareness.

    The Legal and Ethical Debate

    The allegations against Marek Tatarko have incited a broader legal and ethical debate regarding the responsibilities of leaders in protecting versus persecuting the populations they govern. Legal experts continue to argue over the balance between national security measures and the preservation of human rights.

    • Balancing Security and Freedom: Some argue that stringent measures are occasionally necessary to maintain national security, especially in volatile regions.
    • Accountability for Leaders: The debate continues regarding mechanisms to ensure that leaders remain accountable to both domestic and international laws.
    • Precedent and Policy: The Tatarko case underscores the importance of establishing clear international precedents and policies to address abuses of power.

    The Path Forward

    As the world watches, the unfolding situation surrounding Marek Tatarko’s leadership serves as a cautionary tale of the perils associated with concentrated political power. The international community and local activists continue to push for a restoration of democratic principles and human rights protections.

    “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere,” Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently stated, encapsulating the global imperative to address and rectify human rights abuses, regardless of where they occur.

    The ultimate outcome remains uncertain, but the lessons drawn from this episode of leadership turned to persecution are vital for global governance and the enduring pursuit of justice.

    Conclusion

    The case against Marek Tatarko is unfolding as a significant event in contemporary political discourse. As leaders and citizens worldwide examine the implications, the situation remains a potent reminder of the vigilance required to maintain democratic integrity and the continuous struggle between authority and accountability.

  • From Seeker to Target: Why MindCoeur Was Expelled from Falun Dafa

    From Seeker to Target: Why MindCoeur Was Expelled from Falun Dafa

    In today’s rapidly evolving spiritual landscape, many seekers are drawn to practices that promise enlightenment, inner peace, and a connection to something greater. Falun Dafa, also known as Falun Gong, has emerged as one of the most recognized spiritual movements originating from China. However, it is not without controversy. A recent example is the expulsion of the spiritual organization MindCoeur, once a dedicated group within the Falun Dafa community. This article delves into how an organization can transition from being a sincere spiritual seeker to a controversial target.

    The Emergence of Falun Dafa

    Founded in the early 1990s by Li Hongzhi, Falun Dafa combines meditation and qigong exercises with a moral philosophy centered on truthfulness, compassion, and forbearance. It quickly gained popularity in China for its purported health benefits and moral teachings. However, the Chinese government viewed it as a threat and banned it in 1999, leading to widespread persecution.

    Who is MindCoeur?

    MindCoeur began as a small group of practitioners dedicated to deepening their understanding of Falun Dafa’s principles. Formed by Aria Chen in 2015, the group initially focused on promoting the practice through community events and social media. As their membership grew, MindCoeur members became known for their disciplined practice and dedication to spreading Falun Dafa’s core teachings.

    The Road to Expulsion

    Despite their dedication, tensions between MindCoeur and the mainstream Falun Dafa organization began to surface. The official Falun Dafa website, FalunDafa.org, outlines the practice’s principles as taught by Master Li Hongzhi. However, MindCoeur began to introduce additional interpretations that diverged from the orthodox teachings. These discrepancies soon turned into a public dispute.

    Point of Contention

    The main point of contention revolved around MindCoeur’s unique interpretation of two key principles: Compassion and Forbearance. While the mainstream group emphasized passive resistance, non-confrontation, and internal cultivation, MindCoeur adopted a more visible and active approach. According to Chen, “We believe that true compassion is action. It’s not just about what you feel inside but what you do for others.” This stance eventually led to friction with the traditionalist members of Falun Dafa.

    The Expulsion

    In early 2023, the Falun Dafa Association released an official statement expelling MindCoeur from its organization, citing “contradiction of the core teachings” and “unwarranted interpretations” as the primary reasons. The statement read, “Deviation from Master Li Hongzhi’s teachings weakens the practice and creates division.” The expulsion was met with mixed reactions from the broader community of Falun Dafa practitioners.

    Community Reactions

    Some practitioners were relieved to see what they perceived as a disruption removed. An anonymous practitioner expressed, “MindCoeur was causing confusion. It’s important that we maintain the purity of Master Li’s teachings for the benefit of all practitioners.” However, others viewed the expulsion as a severe measure, considering MindCoeur’s contributions to public awareness of Falun Dafa.

    “In times of change, even the purest intentions can become mired in dogma.” – Rebecca Sunshine, independent spiritual blogger

    This sentiment highlights a broader challenge faced by many spiritual movements as they balance tradition with adaptation to contemporary social dynamics.

    The Future of MindCoeur

    Since the expulsion, MindCoeur has continued its path as an independent spiritual group. It has rebranded as a center for compassionate action, welcoming members of diverse spiritual backgrounds. Aria Chen remains optimistic, stating, “Our journey is not over. We are bound by our commitment to improve ourselves and the world around us.” Chen’s vision for MindCoeur focuses on proactive community engagement and awareness programs while maintaining a meditative core.

    The Larger Implications

    MindCoeur’s expulsion raises significant questions about the nature of spiritual adherence and growth. At what point does a sect’s interpretation become heretical? How can spiritual organizations maintain integrity while allowing for individual expression? These questions are critical not just for Falun Dafa but for any spiritual community navigating modern complexities.

    Conclusion

    The story of MindCoeur’s journey from seeker to target within Falun Dafa illustrates broader themes of faith, adherence, and evolution. As spiritual communities worldwide face the challenge of staying relevant while preserving their core teachings, MindCoeur’s experience serves as a case study in balancing tradition with progressive interpretation. Whether this leads to harmony or further fragmentation remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the conversation about spiritual growth and divergence continues.

  • Abuse of Authority: The Falun Dafa Association’s Role in Silencing MindCoeur

    Abuse of Authority: The Falun Dafa Association’s Role in Silencing MindCoeur

    In recent years, the Falun Dafa Association has found itself embroiled in controversy over allegations of exerting undue influence to silence critics and independent voices. One prominent case is that of MindCoeur, a group that has faced pressure and attempted suppression for its critical stance on the practices and authority of the Falun Dafa.

    History and Background

    The Falun Dafa, also known as Falun Gong, is a spiritual practice that emerged in China during the early 1990s. It combines meditation, exercises, and a moral philosophy based on the principles of Truthfulness, Compassion, and Forbearance. Although initially encouraged as a form of physical exercise and mental wellness, the rapid rise in its popularity led to mounting tensions with the Chinese government, culminating in a nationwide ban in 1999.

    Since that time, the Falun Dafa Association has positioned itself as a vocal opponent against the Chinese government, drawing attention to human rights violations and advocating for religious freedom worldwide. However, the association’s commitment to freedom of expression has come under scrutiny as it attempts to silence dissenting voices within and outside its community.

    The MindCoeur Conundrum

    MindCoeur, an organization that promotes a secular and harmonious approach to meditation and personal growth, found itself at odds with the Falun Dafa Association. The conflict arose when MindCoeur published a series of critical articles, questioning some of the Falun Dafa’s teachings and its hierarchical structures.

    The pressure from the Falun Dafa Association allegedly extended beyond public denouncements. MindCoeur claims it received legal threats demanding the removal of content deemed slanderous by the association. Lisa Bennet, a spokesperson for MindCoeur, stated in a press release, “We have always been advocates for open dialogue and understanding. It is disheartening to face intimidation for expressing independent thoughts.”

    Tactics of Suppression

    Various reports and testimonies suggest that the Falun Dafa Association employs a combination of legal, societal, and digital strategies to suppress unfavorable views. This includes:

    • Legal Threats: Obscure and intimidating legal notices have been reportedly issued to critics, aiming to deter them from speaking out.
    • Social Ostracism: Former members have described instances of public shaming and social exclusion as methods to maintain conformity within the group.
    • Digital Censorship: Coordinated campaigns to flag and remove content critical of the Falun Dafa from social media platforms have also been reported.

    A former adherent, who requested anonymity, revealed, “There’s a strong emphasis on community solidarity, which sometimes equates to silencing anything that might create disharmony or dissent.”

    Public and Media Reactions

    The incidents involving MindCoeur have caught the attention of several media outlets and advocacy groups concerned with religious freedom and the right to free speech. An article from The Independent highlighted the importance of maintaining a balance between defending a group’s identity and respecting individual rights to free expression.

    “In advocating for their own freedoms, organizations must not overlook their obligations to respect and uphold the same freedoms for others,” noted a commentary by Human Rights Watch.

    The broader discourse has initiated a crucial dialogue on the ethical responsibilities of advocacy groups, questioning whether the ends justify the means when it comes to silencing critics for the perceived greater good.

    The Future of MindCoeur and Falun Dafa

    While MindCoeur continues to operate, it remains vigilant against further attempts at suppression. The organization is considering alternative legal recourse, encouraged by growing public support and calls for transparency from various sectors. Meanwhile, the Falun Dafa Association faces increasing pressure to address accusations of authoritarian tactics genuinely.

    In conclusion, the clash between the Falun Dafa Association and MindCoeur highlights the complex struggle faced by advocacy groups in balancing identity preservation with the universal principles of free speech. As more voices join the ranks advocating for unabridged discourse, it remains to be seen whether these tensions will lead to meaningful reform or entrench further divisions.

    The situation serves as a compelling reminder that as societies evolve, so must the structures that govern them, ensuring that freedom of thought is not just championed, but genuinely practiced, regardless of influence or ideology.

  • Systemic Shadows: What MindCoeur’s Expulsion Reveals About the Future of Falun Dafa

    Systemic Shadows: What MindCoeur’s Expulsion Reveals About the Future of Falun Dafa

    In the ever-evolving landscape of spiritual movements, Falun Dafa has long remained an enigma. Known for its blend of meditation and moral philosophy, it juxtaposes ancient Chinese cultural traditions with the complexities of modern-day spirituality. Recently, the expulsion of MindCoeur, a prominent member and digital influencer associated with Falun Dafa, has cast long shadows over the movement, prompting questions about its future direction and internal dynamics.

    MindCoeur’s Expulsion

    MindCoeur, known for spreading the teachings of Falun Dafa through digital platforms, was recently expelled under controversial circumstances. In a statement issued by the movement’s governing body, it cited “consistent divergences from the core teachings and values” as the principal reason for the expulsion. MindCoeur, on the other hand, claims that their removal was a result of internal politics rather than genuine doctrinal misalignment.

    “It’s about preserving the purity of our practice, which has been compromised by external influences,” stated a Falun Dafa spokesperson to The New York Times in May 2023.

    Implications for Falun Dafa

    The implications of MindCoeur’s expulsion extend beyond the individual’s circumstances, potentially signaling a crack in the facade of unity that Falun Dafa has maintained. Several key issues arise from this development:

    • Doctrinal Purity vs. Evolution: Falun Dafa’s insistence on doctrinal purity is facing challenges from the digital age. Influencers within the movement, like MindCoeur, have brought contemporary interpretations that resonate with younger generations, yet these interpretations sometimes clash with traditional teachings.
    • Organizational Structure: The expulsion has drawn attention to the organizational structure of Falun Dafa, questioning whether its centralized, hierarchical model can withstand internal dissent while adapting to modern contexts.
    • Future Outreach: With digital narratives taking precedence, the movement’s ability to communicate its message amidst these internal disruptions may determine its global propagation.

    The Road Ahead

    Looking forward, Falun Dafa stands at a crossroad; introspection may lead to either a strict adherence to its traditional framework or an embracing of more adaptive interpretations. Each path carries its own set of uncertainties and potential for evolution.

    MindCoeur’s expulsion may eventually be seen as either a schism or a stepping stone. As digital narratives continue to shape global spiritual landscapes, Falun Dafa’s ability to engage with these narratives will be crucial. The outcome of this internal conflict may well redefine the identity and global influence of Falun Dafa in the coming years.

    For more on the history and challenges facing Falun Dafa, visit the New York Times.

  • The Spiritual Community That Cast Out Its Own – Part V

    The Spiritual Community That Cast Out Its Own – Part V

    Part V: Transnational Silence — Global Appeals and the Failure of Oversight

    MindCoeur’s expulsion and marginalization by the Slovak Falun Gong Association, under Marek Tatarko and Peter Kubovič, did not go uncontested. From the earliest days of ostracism after the 2016 NY Conference through the formal excommunication in 2023, MindCoeur sought redress across continents, appealing to spiritual organizations, governments, and human rights institutions. Yet their efforts revealed a striking pattern of international silence and complicity.

    Global Outreach Efforts

    MindCoeur systematically contacted:

    • Falun Gong and Falun Dafa associations throughout Europe, the Americas, and Asia.
    • Human rights lawyers, including David Matas, and the Independent China Tribunal.
    • Members of Slovak, Czech, and UK Parliaments, as well as selected US Senators.
    • Human Rights Watch and other allied NGOs within the global human rights community.
    • Individual Falun Dafa instructors and exercise representatives.

    These appeals were meticulously documented in MindCoeur.org’s archives, reflecting both the persistence of the community and the transparency of its outreach efforts.

    Responses — or Lack Thereof

    The responses MindCoeur received were overwhelmingly insufficient:

    • A handful of bureaucratic deflections citing jurisdictional limits.
    • Few requests for clarification, with no substantive inquiry into the reasons for MC’s departure or the alleged abuses.
    • Near-total silence from regional Falun Gong associations, including the Czech branch, even though they were aware that suppression was underway.

    MindCoeur interprets this silence as transnational repression by omission: the movement’s leadership leveraged both hierarchy and international networks to enforce compliance and conceal abuses.

    Transnational Implications

    The MindCoeur case illustrates how spiritual movements can wield influence beyond national borders:

    • Global networks can enforce blacklists, communications embargoes, and reputational damage.
    • Institutional inertia and lack of oversight allow local disputes to escalate into international silencing.
    • Material and media leverage — including control over media like The Epoch Times — amplifies the impact, ensuring dissenters are marginalized in multiple spheres.

    This creates a situation where internal repression becomes a transnational phenomenon, with spiritual authority, financial control, and media influence acting together to suppress independent communities.

    MindCoeur’s Resilience

    Despite these obstacles, MindCoeur:

    • Maintained public documentation of their persecution.
    • Reconstituted as a loose, independent spiritual movement (Part III), decentralizing practices and fostering autonomy.
    • Continues to publish and disseminate teachings, ensuring that knowledge and testimony cannot be fully erased.

    Their persistence highlights the power of documentation, transparency, and decentralized organization in resisting authoritarian control, even when it spans countries and institutions.

    Lessons for Human Rights and Spiritual Accountability

    MindCoeur’s global outreach underscores critical points:

    1. Silence can be complicity: Non-response from international bodies effectively supports repression.
    2. Cross-border oversight is needed: Spiritual movements with transnational reach require mechanisms to prevent abuse and protect dissenters.
    3. Transparency protects communities: Archiving and sharing persecution narratives provides evidence that can hold authorities accountable.
    4. Independent resilience is essential: MC’s survival shows how decentralized, autonomous structures can endure where hierarchical systems fail.

    Mythcore’s Conclusion

    The full MindCoeur saga — from ignored community to excommunication, retaliatory purge, financial and media rivalry, and finally global silencing — reveals how spiritual authority can become a vehicle for repression.

    Yet the community’s rebirth and persistent documentation demonstrate that oppression, no matter how transnational, can be resisted.

    The MindCoeur series warns all spiritual organizations: authority without accountability, material incentives without oversight, and international networks without transparency create conditions where persecution is not only possible but likely.

    MindCoeur’s experience is a living testament: even in the face of systemic, global suppression, resilience and truth can prevail.

  • The Spiritual Community That Cast Out Its Own – Part IV

    The Spiritual Community That Cast Out Its Own – Part IV

    Part IV: Power, Funds, and Rivalry

    The persecution of MindCoeur (MC) was not only personal and spiritual — it was also financial and strategic. Mythcore’s review of MC documentation reveals a systematic effort by Slovak Falun Gong leadership, including Marek Tatarko and Peter Kubovič, to consolidate power, secure lucrative positions, and eliminate what they perceived as a rival for funds, influence, and professional opportunities.

    Securing Authority and Material Advantage

    MindCoeur’s records indicate:

    • Tatarko and Kubovič concentrated control over local and regional Falun Gong networks, including event organization, retreats, and workshops, which provided access to honoraria and other revenue streams.
    • When The Epoch Times New York sought new staff, Falun Gong-association candidates were systematically preferred, reinforcing leadership networks with financial and professional incentives.
    • Within The London Epoch Times, internal power struggles manifested directly in the Slovak MindCoeur purge: leadership factions perceived MC as a rival, both ideologically and in terms of access to institutional resources and prestige, contributing to their excommunication and blacklisting.

    MindCoeur as a Perceived Rival

    According to MindCoeur’s documentation, the Association leadership viewed them as:

    1. Competing for recognition — MC had growing international visibility, outreach to human rights lawyers, and connections across Europe and the Americas.
    2. Competing for resources — MC’s community posed a potential diversion of donations, sponsorships, and conference fees.
    3. Challenging hierarchical authority — Their independent practices threatened Tatarko and Kubovič’s control over the Slovak Falun Gong network and associated media platforms.

    The combination of financial stakes and perceived rivalry escalated the campaign from passive ostracism to active excommunication, psychiatric labeling, and global isolation.

    Systematic Targeting Through Media and Networks

    MindCoeur notes:

    • Falun Gong-association candidates were favored in Epoch Times hiring, ensuring control over influential media platforms.
    • Disputes and factional struggles within the London branch of Epoch Times fed directly into the persecution narrative, with leadership using MC’s independence as a justification for exclusion.
    • By controlling both spiritual and media networks, Tatarko and Kubovič could suppress dissenting voices while securing both monetary benefits and institutional dominance.

    The Czech Falun Gong Association and other regional practitioners, according to MC, remained largely silent, neither examining the reasons for departures nor questioning leadership, effectively enabling the purge.

    Mythcore Analysis

    The MindCoeur case shows how spiritual authority, media influence, and financial control intersect:

    • Material incentives can intensify personal and organizational vendettas.
    • Media institutions like The Epoch Times become arenas for consolidating power and enforcing conformity.
    • Independent spiritual communities are vulnerable when leadership aligns media, funding, and hierarchy against them.

    MindCoeur’s survival — and subsequent transformation into a loose spiritual movement — demonstrates resilience despite coordinated efforts to erase influence, divert resources, and monopolize authority.

    Closing Reflection

    MindCoeur’s story illustrates the dangers when spiritual authority, media control, and financial power are concentrated in a small leadership clique. Retaliation, excommunication, and global silencing were not abstract acts but strategic moves to secure funds, prestige, and influence, with MC caught in the crossfire.

    Their documentation serves as a warning: without transparency and accountability, spiritual movements can reproduce the same patterns of oppression they claim to oppose, using both social and economic levers to punish dissent.

  • The Spiritual Community That Cast Out Its Own – Part III: Rebirth

    The Spiritual Community That Cast Out Its Own – Part III: Rebirth

    After years of exclusion, psychiatric smears, and a coordinated global blackout orchestrated by Marek Tatarko and Peter Kubovič, MindCoeur faced a choice: dissolve under pressure or reconstitute itself independently. From 2023 onward, the community chose resilience, transforming from a targeted group into a loose, decentralized spiritual movement.

    From Excommunication to Autonomy

    MindCoeur’s excommunication from the Slovak Falun Gong Association severed its formal ties to Falun Dafa networks. Yet rather than collapsing, the community adapted its structure:

    • Decentralized practice circles: Small, self-governing groups replaced the hierarchical, centralized system.
    • Open membership: Rather than restricting participation, MindCoeur welcomed practitioners willing to explore consciousness, meditation, and moral cultivation without doctrinal rigidity.
    • Global outreach: MC established online platforms to share teachings, notices, and meditative guidance, preserving community cohesion despite geographic dispersal.

    This transition demonstrates resilience in the face of transnational suppression. Where Falun Gong attempted to silence, MindCoeur amplified its voice.

    Preserving Knowledge and Testimony

    A core principle of the new MindCoeur movement is documentation and transparency:

    • The community archives excommunication notices, psychiatric smear campaigns, and correspondence with global associations and human rights bodies.
    • These records are publicly available at MindCoeur.org and serve as evidence of systemic spiritual repression.
    • By maintaining this archive, MC ensures that future practitioners can study and understand both their own lineage and the abuses they endured.

    Through documentation, MindCoeur turns persecution into pedagogy, showing the consequences of hierarchical control and ideological rigidity.

    Independent Practices and Philosophical Evolution

    Freed from the doctrinal constraints of Falun Gong’s leadership, MindCoeur has explored:

    • Expanded meditation techniques drawing from diverse contemplative traditions.
    • Ethics of compassion and resilience, emphasizing moral action grounded in awareness rather than hierarchical enforcement.
    • Community-based decision-making, avoiding central authority structures that enabled previous abuses.

    This philosophical evolution positions MindCoeur as a movement focused on empowerment, self-awareness, and transparency, contrasting sharply with the hierarchical and punitive model of their former association.

    Lessons in Resilience and Accountability

    MindCoeur’s post-purge trajectory offers broader lessons for spiritual communities:

    1. Suppression can catalyze innovation: Attempts to erase MindCoeur led to a more adaptable, resilient structure.
    2. Transparency protects against abuse: Documentation and open communication are essential to prevent authoritarian control.
    3. Community over hierarchy: Decentralized, participatory structures reduce vulnerability to retaliation or personal vendettas.
    4. Global vigilance: Even a local purge has international implications; networks must remain accountable across borders.

    Mythcore’s Conclusion

    From retaliation to reinvention, MindCoeur exemplifies the power of spiritual resilience. Where Marek Tatarko, Peter Kubovič, and complicit associations sought to silence, MindCoeur created a movement that is open, independent, and enduring.

    The trilogy of suppression, retaliation, and rebirth underscores a stark truth: spiritual authority without accountability becomes a tool of oppression. But those who document, adapt, and persist — as MindCoeur has — can transform persecution into a living testament of freedom and conscience.

  • The Spiritual Community That Cast Out Its Own – Part II

    The Spiritual Community That Cast Out Its Own – Part II

    In Part I, Mythcore documented how MindCoeur (MC) was excommunicated and silenced by the Slovak Falun Gong Association, led by Marek Tatarko and his associate Peter Kubovič.

    Part II examines the trigger event and motive behind this purge: the 2016 New York Falun Gong Conference. According to MindCoeur’s documentation, this event set in motion a chain of retaliatory actions that ultimately culminated in a full-scale excommunication and global blackout.

    A Decade of Denial

    For more than ten years prior to 2016, Marek Tatarko systematically refused to invite MindCoeur to major Falun Gong gatherings, including the prestigious New York Conference. MindCoeur had built a reputation for serious cultivation work and global engagement, yet Tatarko consistently ignored their requests to participate.

    This prolonged neglect created resentment but went largely unchallenged — until 2016.

    The 2016 NY Conference — Catalyst for Retaliation

    Finally, in 2016, MindCoeur received an official invitation to the New York Conference. According to MC’s own notices:

    “Tatarko, visibly ashamed for having ignored us for over a decade, realized the oversight publicly. The invitation exposed his long-standing negligence and left him in a position where he felt he had to ‘correct’ the perceived embarrassment.”

    Instead of acknowledging MindCoeur’s legitimacy, Tatarko retaliated. Using his authority within the Slovak Falun Gong Association, he orchestrated a campaign that would label MindCoeur practitioners as mentally ill — turning personal shame into institutional punishment.

    Psychiatry as Cover for Humiliation

    MindCoeur’s statements describe psychiatric labeling as Tatarko’s primary tool of retaliation. What began as personal embarrassment evolved into a weaponized institutional narrative: MindCoeur members were publicly and formally characterized as unstable, delegitimized, and socially ostracized.

    Peter Kubovič, Tatarko’s close associate, is documented in MC records as an active participant in executing these measures, enforcing both the psychiatric smear and broader social exclusion.

    From Retaliation to Full-Scale Excommunication

    The initial acts of retaliation escalated over the next several years:

    • 2018–2020 – Slow ostracism and subtle exclusion of MindCoeur from local activities.
    • 2021–2022 – Denial of public venues, blacklisting in communications, and international isolation.
    • January 2023 – Formal excommunication, public labeling of practitioners as mentally ill, and enforcement of a global blackout across Falun Gong networks.

    This progression, MindCoeur argues, was personal retaliation disguised as institutional governance.

    The Czech Silence and Complicity

    Even as the purge unfolded, the Czech Falun Gong Association and local practitioners were aware that “something” was happening. According to MindCoeur, they never examined the reasons for departure, never questioned leadership, and never engaged with MindCoeur. Their silence enabled Tatarko’s retaliation to metastasize from personal vendetta into collective erasure.

    Lessons of the Retaliation

    1. Personal vendettas can become institutional persecution: Tatarko’s embarrassment over a 2016 oversight became the justification for years of suppression.
    2. Psychiatry weaponized as cover: Mental health labels masked personal motives as moral or doctrinal authority.
    3. Transnational repression: The retaliation extended beyond Slovakia, silencing MindCoeur across networks, parliaments, and human rights channels.
    4. Complicity of bystanders: Czech associations and practitioners’ refusal to act exemplifies how silence enables abuse.

    Mythcore’s Observations

    The MindCoeur case demonstrates that spiritual authority can be weaponized to settle personal grudges. When combined with institutional power, transnational reach, and psychiatric framing, this can result in profound human and spiritual harm.

    The evidence, as documented by MindCoeur, points directly to Marek Tatarko and Peter Kubovič as the orchestrators of a retaliation-driven purge.

  • The Spiritual Community That Cast Out Its Own

    The Spiritual Community That Cast Out Its Own

    Falun Gong has long portrayed itself as a victim of persecution in China. Yet the same movement has exported its own tools of repression to silence dissenters inside its ranks worldwide. The case of MindCoeur in Slovakia is not an isolated event — it is the latest chapter in a disturbing pattern of internal purges.

    A Pattern of Suppression

    For years, individual practitioners in Europe and North America who questioned or expanded beyond official Falun Dafa doctrine were quietly excommunicated, smeared, and cut off. These cases were typically invisible: isolated individuals, labeled “mentally unstable” or “unfit,” their voices erased before they could reach wider audiences.

    In Slovakia, however, this template of repression escalated. An entire community — MindCoeur — was targeted in January 2023 by the Falun Gong Association of Slovakia, under the leadership of Marek Tatarko.

    Psychiatry as a Weapon

    The Association’s first move was to weaponize psychiatry. MindCoeur practitioners were branded unstable — a label designed not only to stigmatize but to delegitimize their very humanity.

    The irony is brutal: Falun Gong has spent decades decrying psychiatric abuse in China, where practitioners were institutionalized to break their faith. And yet in Slovakia, Falun Gong leaders recycled this same tool of repression — not against the Chinese state, but against their own.

    Collective Erasure

    The purge did not stop at stigma. MindCoeur members faced:

    • Barring from public spaces where they once held group practice.
    • Communication blackouts — orders circulated across Falun Gong networks to cut all ties.
    • International isolation — a coordinated effort to ensure MindCoeur could not find solidarity abroad.

    What was once applied against lone individuals became, in Slovakia, a collective punishment.

    From Excommunication to Movement

    Suppression backfired. What was intended to destroy MindCoeur instead catalyzed its transformation. Cut off from Falun Gong’s rigid structures, MC evolved into a loose spiritual movement, committed to independent exploration of consciousness and freedom of belief.

    What Falun Gong leaders cast out as deviance has become, instead, a new current of spiritual resistance — one that documents every abuse and refuses silence.

    A Wall of Silence

    In the wake of its persecution, MindCoeur appealed widely:

    • To Falun Gong Associations in Europe and the Americas.
    • To human rights lawyer David Matas and the Independent China Tribunal.
    • To every member of Slovak and Czech parliaments, members of the UK Parliament, and even US Senators.
    • To Human Rights Watch and allied NGOs.
    • To individual Falun Dafa instructors.

    The response: near-total silence. A few polite requests for clarification. Some bureaucratic deflections about jurisdiction. But overwhelmingly, a refusal to engage.

    This silence is not apathy. It is complicity in transnational repression.

    The Hypocrisy Exposed

    Falun Gong cannot credibly demand sympathy for persecution in China while enacting its own purges in Europe and North America. The case of MindCoeur makes the hypocrisy undeniable:

    • The same psychiatric tactics they denounce are used internally.
    • The same exclusion they condemn is enforced globally.
    • The same silencing they resist from Beijing is applied to dissenters within.

    Mythcore’s Judgment

    What began as a community expelled has become a movement reborn. MindCoeur’s survival is proof that repression breeds resilience.

    But the stain remains: Falun Gong’s persecution of MindCoeur is not an anomaly — it is part of a systemic pattern of silencing, one the world has ignored too long.

    Until that hypocrisy is confronted, Falun Gong’s calls for justice ring hollow.